NCLT JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 248, 248(1), 252, 252(1), 252(3), 455 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, SECTION 252 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND RULE 7, 9 OF COMPANIES (REMOVAL OF NAMES OF COMPANIES FROM THE REGISTER OF COMPANIES) RULES, 2016
NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET KUMAR 8383098478 , 9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 , 9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com Bds Security Services Private Limited Vs. Registrar Of Companies Nct Of Delhi And Haryana And Ors, (2020) 07 NCLT CK 0033 NCLT allowed the appeal filed by the applicant, under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 for restoration of the name of the struck off company. While allowing the appeal NCLT held that the Appellant has submitted sufficient evidence that it has been in operation since incorporation and during the period preceding strike off, therefore it could not be termed as a defunct company as per section 252 of the Act. Thus, taking into consideration the provisions of Section 252(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 wh...